There’s an old principle — “change everything, so as not to change anything.”
That’s the perfect description of the current interest rate scenario.
Yields Tell the Story
A single figure explains the situation:
- 13-week bill YTM (July 1 → July 14): 4.225 → 4.112 (-11.3 bp)
- 30-year bond YTM (benchmark for 30-year mortgage): 4.779 → 4.883 (+10.4 bp)
The Fed is allowing the market to set the YTM on the 30-year bond while controlling the 13-week bill.
The result: a small, illusory drop in the official short-term rate that pleases the political side and banking lobbies, but leaves mortgage rates high, passive income is hard to let go of. This is a political and cosmetic operation with no real systemic effect, except for a brief, emotional market reaction.
What a “Real” Rate Cut Looks Like
A genuine rate cut — one that reduces yields across all maturities from 3 months to 30 years — would fuel the market and set the stage for a short-term path toward further reductions, potentially down to 3.25–3.50% from the current 4.50%.
For now, the Fed appears to be “playing” to please both the political-economic system and the banking lobbies, making genuine rate-lowering policy ineffective.
Two Conditions for a Real Rate Cut
- Federal Deficit Reduction: Already underway under Trump, according to the Treasury Budget Report.
- Stable and Declining Inflation: CPI and PCE around 2.50% and falling, with no inflationary pressure from energy or shelter.
Virtue Signaling vs. Substance
Until these conditions are met, rate adjustments are little more than virtue signaling —
moves designed to appease political leaders and financial lobbies rather than enact real economic change.
The result: policy that looks active on paper but is passive in effect.